Canada: Stop Playing Politics and Approve the Keystone Pipeline

November 14, 2012 at 1:46 pm (Canada, Energy, Environment, Keystone Pipeline, President Obama)

During his acceptance speech, a freshly re-elected President Obama spoke of a message that he received from the American people, a message to “focus on your jobs” and to tackle the challenge of “freeing ourselves from foreign oil”.

With that in mind, there is one project in the international spotlight that would quickly and easily address both of those issues – approval of the Keystone XL Pipeline.

And now, our Canadian allies are urging the White House to stop playing politics, stop sending mixed signals, stop stalling, and approve the project that would not only benefit our neighbors to the north, but the United States economy itself.

For the past year, the Obama administration played politics with the Keystone project in an attempt to placate the far-left environmental contingency in the Democrat party, creating confusion about the future of the pipeline and leaving Canada to wonder if their support and friendship were being taken for granted.

Peter McKenna, chair of the Political Science Department at the University of Prince Edward Island stated, “It made sense for Obama to put that (Keystone) on the back burner to deal with the environmental constituency of the Democratic Party”.

He added however, that issues affecting Canada need to be addressed now that the election is over, citing the Keystone XL Pipeline as “the most important issue”.

While the President’s initial decision to reject the pipeline was blatantly political in nature, it came at a cost to the American people, delaying real job creation and energy progress.  Now however, approving construction should be a no-brainer.

In a post-election editorial, The Globe and Mail wrote:

Last January, President Barack Obama rejected TransCanada Corp.’s proposal to build a pipeline carrying Canadian bitumen from the Alberta oil sands to refineries in the United States, including some in Texas on the Gulf of Mexico coast. The rejection was a calculated election-year move aimed at appeasing Mr. Obama’s supporters in the powerful environmental movement. With his re-election, the President should now move quickly to approve the Keystone XL pipeline on its merits alone.

While Peter McKenna sees approval of the pipeline happening in the next six to twelve months, and with Moody’s also predicting approval, Stephen Ewart, Editor of the Calgary Herald’s Energy and Economics section isn’t quite as optimistic.

Ewart counters that approval of the pipeline is anything but a ‘no-brainer’, citing scheduled protests over the pipeline that will apply pressure to the White House, as well as looming concerns from environmental activists over the effects of climate change, concerns freshly renewed by the impact of Hurricane Sandy.

Ewart adds that despite the election results seemingly freeing the President to make the right decision on the pipeline, concern for his legacy means politics will continue to play a role in that decision.

He writes, “Obama has provided little insight into his views on Keystone XL, but it seems unlikely politics will not play a role in the decision that will impact his presidential legacy.”

Uncertainty north of the border has been amplified by the administration’s silence thus far on the project.  Rather than following his campaign slogan by moving ‘forward’ with the project, President Obama has remained non-committal.

James Wood, also in the Calgary Herald, concurs.

“… Obama, who earlier this year rejected TransCanada Corp.’s initial application because it needed more environmental review, has remained noncommittal about the fate of the line”.

Uncertainty for our Canadian allies creates another major concern for the U.S. – the threat of oil and economic resources being exported to China.

The Globe and Mail editorial cites this possibility:

“The pipeline has even been touted as the best way for Canadian producers to export crude to China, by putting it on ships once it arrives in the Gulf.”

Most importantly, the same editorial spells out in simple terms why the Keystone XL Pipeline should easily garner approval.  Aside from the many economic and energy benefits, the project has worked around areas that were of greatest concern to the environmental obstructionists.

The “merits are many, and they serve both Canada and the United States. TransCanada Corp. has proposed a new route that avoids environmentally sensitive areas in Nebraska and reduces potential impact on the vital Ogallala aquifer. The pipeline’s construction will create jobs, secure a hungry market for the heavier crude from the oil sands, decrease North American dependency on overseas oil, and help lower the price of gas in the United States.”

Will the Obama administration follow through on their promise to focus on jobs and free the United States from the constraints of foreign oil?  Perhaps of equal import, will they make a decision before these valuable resources end up benefitting other foreign countries such as China?

The economic benefits to our nation and our neighbors to the north are far too numerous to allow this opportunity to slip away.

Cross-posted at FreedomWorks

Permalink Leave a Comment

Who Better to Lead Us to Energy Independence Than Abraham Lincoln?

October 24, 2012 at 8:01 pm (Abraham Lincoln, Energy, Energy Independence, Green Energy)

That’s right – a company known as Abraham Lincoln Electric And Gas (ALEAG).

Here are some fun facts about ALEAG, a leader in green energy solutions:

ALEAG is proud to its part in making America energy independent and financially appealing for global business. 

ALEAG is a nationwide energy provider that offers a myriad of energy options for both residential and commercial.

ALEAG will design an energy plan around your current and future needs.

ALEAG has the ability to give FLEX pricing, FLAT rate pricing, and LOCKED pricing… Even combinations of all three. 

ALEAG rates are updated daily and are always competitive. 

ALEAG never charges hidden fees – the rate you’re quoted, is the rate your guaranteed.  

ALEAG can give quotes for energy pricing up to a year in advance in most markets, allowing you to take advantage of energy futures. 

ALEAG can give free quotes via the web – Meaning no high pressure sales pitch, or misleading marketing gimmicks. 

ALEAG will give a portion of EVERY sale to an American based charity in your name.  

The Abraham Lincoln Electric and Gas Company is honored to serve you and especially those who served.  If you are an owner of a business and a Veteran, please let us know when requesting a quote.  Pricing will be adjusted accordingly.  Please note, that ALEAG uses green energy whenever possible and can create a 100% GREEN energy solution in most markets. 

Please request a free quote today.

At the bottom where it says ‘How did you hear about us?’, tell them the Mental Recession sent you.

And here are a couple of brochures to pass around…

ALEAG – Power to the People – 2012

ALEAG – Green Energy Solutions

Permalink Leave a Comment

Hippie Fail: Protesters Try to Stop Keystone Pipeline Construction … By Chaining Themselves to Equipment That Isn’t Being Used

September 13, 2012 at 10:20 am (Energy, Environment, Hippies, Jobs, Keystone Pipeline, Protest)

A group known as the Tar Sands Blockade has come up with a brilliant idea that is sure to rock the environmental and energy debate – chaining themselves to equipment in an attempt to halt work on the job-creating Keystone Pipeline. 

It may go done as one of the saddest protest efforts in history.

Here is a sampling of their self-congratulatory announcement:

“Today’s action has halted work on a segment of TransCanada’s illegitimate pipeline outside of Saltillo, TX. As promised, Tar Sands Blockade’s rolling campaign of nonviolent civil disobedience pushes forward. Five blockaders total are currently risking arrest to stop work on this segment of the Keystone XL pipeline. Contractors discovered their presence early in the work day, and work at the site was called off shortly thereafter.”

Uh oh…

One protester in a local news story (video below) explains why it’s so important for this group to stop construction of the pipeline.

“It’s necessary to stop this pipeline. It’s a threat to our constitutional rights.” – noted constitutional scholar and Tar Sands protestor.

The pipeline you say, infringes upon your Constitutional rights?  Well no actually, no it doesn’t.

But the genius doesn’t end there … the group of protesters chained themselves to equipment that wasn’t even being used.

Money quote from the news story:

“TransCanada says the protesters chained themselves to a third-party contractor’s equipment that was not going to be used today.”

Brilliant!

The group is so committed to the cause that they’ve decided to work all the way up until lunch time.

“It’s after lunch now, so we’re gonna follow the lead of our contractor and police friends and call it a day!

Dedication baby!

Of course, pay no mind to the concessions TransCanada has already made in supporting a new pipeline route in Nebraska, one that would shield sensitive areas from construction.

“Today TransCanada announced the selection of a revised route for the Keystone XL Pipeline which bypasses the sensitive Sandhills region of Nebraska. The new route will result in the project crossing fewer miles of threatened and endangered species habitat, and fewer streams, rivers, and wetlands while completely avoiding sensitive Wellhead Protection Areas where the state’s groundwater resources are particularly shallow. These changes will further increase the resiliency of the Keystone XL pipeline which the U.S. State Department already declared ‘would have a degree of safety greater than any typically constructed domestic oil pipeline system.’”

But hey, never let facts yet in the way of a good misguided protest.

Hippies are so awesome…

Permalink Leave a Comment

Romney Outlines Plan For Energy Independence

August 23, 2012 at 5:00 am (Economy, Energy, Energy Independence, Gas Prices, Middle Class, Mitt Romney, New Mexico, Resources, Superpower)

During a visit to Watson Truck & Supply in Hobbs, New Mexico, Mitt Romney will present a crucial component of his Plan for a Stronger Middle Class: a comprehensive energy strategy to achieve North American energy independence by 2020 and establish America as an energy superpower in the 21st century.

From analysts at Citigroup and Raymond James, to experts at think tanks like the Manhattan Institute, to scholars at the Harvard Kennedy School, there is a growing consensus that energy independence can become a reality. The widespread benefits of embracing the development of America’s natural resources will be felt across the nation and spur the economic recovery that Americans are still waiting for.
The Romney Agenda:
·         Federal Lands: Empower States To Control Onshore Energy Development
·         Offshore Areas: Open Offshore Areas For Energy Development
·         North America: Pursue a North American Energy Partnership
·         Resource Evaluation: Ensure Accurate Assessment Of Energy Resources
·         Regulatory Reform: Restore Transparency And Fairness To Permitting And Regulation
·         Innovation: Facilitate Private-Sector-Led Development Of New Energy Technologies
The Results:
·         More than three million new jobs, including over one million in manufacturing
·         An economic resurgence adding more than $500 billion to GDP
·         A stronger dollar and a reduced trade deficit
·         More than $1 trillion in revenue for federal, state, and local governments
·         Lower energy prices for job creators and middle-class families
·         National security strengthened by freedom from dependence on foreign energy supplies
The Romney campaign released a white paper demonstrating the potential to achieve energy independence by 2020, highlighting the extraordinary benefits for the middle class that would accompany such an achievement, and detailing the policies he will pursue in support of this agenda.

Energy Policy White Paper 8.23

Permalink Leave a Comment

Watch – If I Wanted America to Fail

April 25, 2012 at 9:22 am (America, Earth Day, Economy, Energy, Free, Government, If I Wanted America to Fail, Market, Politics, President Obama)

The following video has gone viral for a reason.  It is subtle evidence that the President’s energy policy is setting America up to fail.

Watch it.

Via Michelle Malkin (h/t All-American Blogger):

This weekend, a video produced by Free Market America went live on YouTube — and it is racking up nationwide hits. Deservedly so. The Earth Day-timed message is compelling and extremely relevant this campaign season. As the group writes: “The environmental agenda has been infected by extremism — it’s become an economic suicide pact. And we’re here to challenge it.”

Permalink Leave a Comment

Ten Years Ago Democrats Blocked Drilling in ANWR Because It Would Take 10 Years to See Results

April 19, 2012 at 11:03 am (Alaska, ANWR, Democrats, Energy, Environment, Gas Prices)

Way to be forward thinking there…  But, but, the environment!  Polar bears!  Caribou!

Via Gateway Pundit:

Ten years ago, Senate Democrats blocked energy production in a small portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). At the time, they claimed that ANWR should be off limits because the oil would take 10 years to reach the market. Ten years later, ANWR remains closed, gas prices have skyrocketed, and Democrats continue to block additional energy production.

Meanwhile, gas prices have soared under Obama:

Permalink Leave a Comment

More Coal Plants Closing Due to EPA Regulations

January 26, 2012 at 11:28 am (Coal, Economy, Energy, EPA, FirstEnergy, Jobs, Ohio, President Obama)

Obama the Job Creator strikes again.

From Thurber’s Thoughts:

FirstEnergy today announced the closing of six coal-fired plants, including our plant here in Oregon, Ohio, and three others in our state. We already have some of the highest electricity rates in the state. How much will our rates go up without this local plant?

And what about the employees??? More than 500 employees will be out of work, though some may relocate to other plants or take early retirement. And then there are the ancillary jobs and economic benefits that will decrease, including transportation, office and manufacturing suppliers, etc…

So much for a President who said his number one priority was jobs.

The press release gives the specific reason for the plant closings:

The decision to close the plants is based on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), which were recently finalized, and other environmental regulations.

Read the press release here…

President Obama is not concerned about jobs or economic growth, he is bound to a rigid green tech ideology.  He provided a glimpse of things to come when he said this:

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.

The President stated that he would actively work to bankrupt a major job-generating industry in America.
We call that ‘killing jobs’.

To the President it’s ‘mission accomplished’.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Democrat Lawmaker Says 20,000 Jobs is Not That Many

January 26, 2012 at 11:05 am (CH2M Hill, Dan Coats, Energy, Green Jobs, Jan Schakowsky, Keystone Pipeline, Keystone XL, Solyndra, Unemployment)

Just curious, if you or someone you know is struggling to find work, how does a statement like this make you feel?  It certainly provides a significant look into the mind of a Democrat who is perfectly fine with killing 20,000 jobs in the name of some perceived and unrealistic environmental threat.

From the Hill:

Chicago Democratic Rep. Jan Schakowsky (Ill.) drew fire from Sen. Dan Coats (R-Ind.) on Wednesday when she dismissed the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline, suggesting the 20,000 jobs it could create were relatively insignificant in the scheme of the greater economy.

“Twenty thousand jobs is really not that many jobs, and investing in green technologies will produce that and more,” she said on Chicago’s WLS Radio Don Wade and Roma Show on Wednesday morning. “But I’ll tell you what, you know it seems to me that the Republicans would rather have an issue than a pipeline.”

“Tell that to the 20,000 people that woke up this morning and didn’t have a job to go to,” said Coats. “ ‘Well, these don’t really matter’ — I mean, this not only is jobs, this is less dependence on Middle East oil.”

Investing in the green jobs boondoggle will create that and more?  Not sure the unemployed at Solyndra or CH2M Hill would agree. 
Green energy investment has been such an overwhelming success that the unemployment rate has increased since Obama’s stimulus plan took hold, and there are now 2,000,000 fewer jobs in the U.S. today.

Is that a lot of jobs?

Permalink Leave a Comment

Keystone Less of a Risk Than Pipelines Already in Place, Experts Say

January 21, 2012 at 10:36 am (Canada, Dave Heineman, Energy, Independence, Keystone, Keystone XL Pipeline, Pipeline, President Obama, Thomas J. Donahue, TransCanada, U.S.)

Pipeline to nowhere?

President Obama recently unleashed his first campaign ad for the 2012 election year.  The 30-second spot is described as such:

President Obama has taken steps to make us energy independent and create an economy that’s built to last. He’s been a strong supporter of domestic energy production, has made historic investments in clean energy technology, and has nearly doubled fuel-efficiency standards for cars and trucks. Because of the progress we’ve made, our dependence on foreign oil is the lowest it’s been in 16 years.

The Washington Post gave the ad a rating of ‘three Pinocchios’ for misleading viewers with a suggestion that Obama was responsible for creating 2.7 million clean-energy jobs, and for cherry-picking certain citations to back up its claims.  The resulting descriptions of the ad included such words as ‘slippery’, ‘slick’, and ‘misleading’.  


The Obama administration in a nutshell.


But the irony that the first ad campaign of the season touts Obama’s strengths in making the United States more energy independent, while he is simultaneously thwarting further energy independence via the Keystone pipeline, can not be overlooked. 


U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas J. Donohue called the decision to deny the Keystone XL pipeline permit ‘dumbfounding’.  He added, “the President’s decision will make us more dependent on oil from foreign nations that don’t share our interests.”


So why would the energy independence-touting President deny construction of a pipeline that has the potential to improve said independence, along with an added bonus of creating a minimum of 20,000 jobs?


Aside from kowtowing to environmental groups, Obama cites “the health and safety of the American people, as well as our environment”.


That smokescreen doesn’t hold up either.  A new report from Fox News indicates that the Keystone pipeline would actually pose less of an environmental danger than pipelines currently running in the U.S.

Several energy experts who represent the oil and gas industry say the controversial Keystone XL, a 1,700-mile pipeline that would run from Canada to Texas, poses less of a risk to the environment than the estimated 50,000 miles of crude oil pipelines already crisscrossing the U.S., a network they say is safe and efficient.

The report also cites the new pipeline’s state-of-the-art technology as being improved safety-wise, as well as the alternative to a pipeline – hauling oil by tanker, truck, or train – a far more perilous environmental risk.
Additionally, though environmentalists expressed concerns that the Keystone pipeline would cross the Ogallala Aquifer, one of the world’s largest aquifers extending into eight states and providing drinking water for two million people, the concerns are unfounded.  Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman, a Republican who had voiced concerns over the aquifer, said “an alternative route being worked out with TransCanada will not pose a risk to environmentally sensitive areas.”
Heineman added that he would send a letter to the President saying he approves it, “and if he were decisive, he could turn around and approve it shortly thereafter.”
Problem being, the only decisive move the President has made involves placing politics above jobs, above energy independence, and above the well-being of the American people.






Permalink Leave a Comment