Libs Accuse Romney of Dyeing His Face Brown to Appeal to Latino Voters

September 21, 2012 at 10:44 am (Barack Obama, Brownface, Democratic Underground, Dyeing Brown, Gawker, Hillary Clinton, Huffington post, Latino, Mitt Romney, Skin Color, Univision)

Waiting for the punchline?  There isn’t one.

This isn’t a satirical article, ala The Onion.  Nor is it a joke.

Liberal websites Gawker, the Huffington Post, and Democratic Underground are actually pushing the conspiracy theory that Mitt Romney dyed his face brown for an interview on Univision, in an attempt to appeal to Latino voters.

Here’s the Gawker write-up:

Mitt Romney currently trails President Obama among registered Latino voters by nearly 40%, and getting caught saying things like “it would be helpful to be Latino” certainly isn’t helping.

But has it gotten so bad that Romney is now resorting to “brownface” in order to make himself more appealing to Univision viewers?  Democratic Underground has looked at the photo above from last night’s “presidential forum”and concluded that, yes, Romney definitely “dyed his face brown.”

I would imagine it has to actually physically hurt a person to be this level of stupid.

Of course, these liberal sites do not necessarily concentrate their stupidity on any one group, they tend to spread it around.

Remember when the Huffington Post was accusing a Hillary Clinton ad of darkening the face of Barack Obama to make him look more ‘threatening’?

Permalink Leave a Comment

Actual Article: Sympathy For Those Who Want to Have "Sex" With Children

September 9, 2012 at 1:00 pm (Children, Cord Jefferson, Gawker, Jesus, Noel Sheppard, Pedophile, Pedophilia, Rape, Sex, Warner Todd Huston)

Gawker may have never produced such an offensive article in their long offensive history as the one they posted on Friday by Cord Jefferson.

The title says it all:

Born This Way: Sympathy and Science for Those Who Want to Have Sex with Children

Not once in the lengthy piece does Jefferson refer to the act in it’s proper terminology – rape.  Worse, he categorizes the act of raping children as a ‘sexual orientation’, treating it as a harmless choice no different than homosexuality, as opposed to a violent crime.

The article is sick and disgusting on so many levels.  It begins with a sympathetic story involving a man named Terry, who has been convicted of raping his seven-year-old niece.  Fitting with the theme that this was a sexual act and not a crime, Jefferson attempts to create sympathy for the rapist – portraying him as a religious man who was the victim of an abusive marriage, and describing what happens with his niece as an actual ‘relationship’.

As Jefferson explains, “it’s not easy to listen to Terry talk about the time he had sex with a seven-year-old girl”.  I would imagine it would be infinitely harder to listen to the little girl’s version.  Or her parents story.

Terry, Jefferson then explains, “fell for his niece and began a sexual relationship with her”.

The rest of the story is rather graphic.

The problem here is that the author doesn’t seem able to comprehend the difference between rape and sex, and he is rationalizing the behavior of pedophiles.  As an example, at one point Jefferson describes the rapist’s mindset – “I had the thought that I would never hurt her and that she would grow up trusting me.”

This is such a typical behavior by pedophiles that it’s hard to imagine anyone could write such a statement without recognizing it as “grooming”, a technique used by child rapists to gain the trust of their child victims.

Noel Sheppard of NewsBusters also points out that Jefferson wonders why pedophiles “don’t enjoy the same kind of tolerance” as other people who may simply be attracted to “busty women” or “tall men”.

Holy hell!  In what parallel universe does a sane individual not recognize the difference between being attracted to busty women and small children?

Sheppard also points out that a case for tolerance can be made, according to the article, because ‘Jesus would embrace pedophiles’.

Warner Todd Huston points out in his analysis that this simply isn’t so:

Gawker writer Cord should be ashamed of himself for having said that Jesus would “embrace” pedophiles. As the website Poor Richard’s News notes (by way of Newsbusters), the Bible does not excuse pedophilia..

But whoever causes the downfall of one of these little ones who believe in Me—it would be better for him if a heavy millstone were hung around his neck and he were drowned in the depths of the sea! — Matthew 18: 6

“Jesus died for the forgiveness of sin, not the embrace of it,” the site notes. “The Bible is very clear that while all sins can be forgiven, Jesus never ever embraces the sin itself. He made no bones about the punishment for harming a child.”

There is a special section in hell for child rapists, no doubt.

Gawker needs to apologize for this piece immediately and let the public know that Jefferson’s pro-pedophilia platform will not be tolerated in their pages again.

Terminate this sick, sick man immediately.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Liberal Website That Attacked Romney’s Cayman Island ‘Schemes’, Hides Their Income in The Cayman Islands

August 23, 2012 at 6:03 pm (Bain Capital, Cayman Islands, Gawker, Gawker Media Group, Mitt Romney, Tax Scheme)

Earlier today, the liberal website Gawker did a document dump including 950 pages worth of confidential documents affiliated with Bain Capital.

The idea was to expose Mitt Romney’s alleged tax-dodging schemes with offshore accounts in the Cayman Islands.

Gawker writes:

Today, we are publishing more than 950 pages of internal audits, financial statements, and private investor letters for 21 cryptically named entities in which Romney had invested—at minimum—more than $10 million as of 2011 (that number is based on the low end of ranges he has disclosed—the true number is almost certainly significantly higher). Almost all of them are affiliated with Bain Capital, the secretive private equity firm Romney co-founded in 1984 and ran until his departure in 1999 (or 2002, depending on whom you ask).

Many of them are offshore funds based in the Cayman Islands. Together, they reveal the mind-numbing, maze-like, and deeply opaque complexity with which Romney has handled his wealth, the exotic tax-avoidance schemes available only to the preposterously wealthy that benefit him, the unlikely (for a right-wing religious Mormon) places that his money has ended up, and the deeply hypocritical distance between his own criticisms of Obama’s fiscal approach and his money managers’ embrace of those same policies.

So if being based in the Cayman Islands immediately translates to a ‘tax-avoidance scheme available only to the preposterously wealthy’, then why is Gawker complaining?

After all, the Gawker Media Group is domiciled in  – you guessed it – the Cayman Islands.

Gawker Media has been going through a big corporate revamp over the past year or so. The ultimate parent company has never been in the U.S.: it used to be Blogwire in Hungary, but now Blogwire Hungary has become a subsidiary of a Cayman Islands entity called Gawker Media Group Inc, which also owns various U.S. operations like Gawker Media LLC, Gawker Entertainment LLC, Gawker Technology LLC, and Gawker Sales LLC.

Then there’s this…

The Hungarian companies get all of Gawker’s international income, which flows in from 13 different salespeople in ten different countries and which, since it’s international income flowing to a Hungarian company owned by a Cayman Islands parent, is basically pure profit which never comes close to being taxed in the U.S. The result is a company where 130 U.S. employees eat up the lion’s share of the U.S. revenues, resulting in little if any taxable income, while the international income, the franchise value of the brands, and the value of the technology all stays permanently overseas, untouched by the IRS.

Remarkable hypocrisy…

Permalink Leave a Comment