Did MSNBC Intentionally Cut Every Speech Made By a Minority Speaker at the RNC?

August 29, 2012 at 7:09 am (Artur Davis, Blacks, Brian Sandoval, Chris Matthews, Hispanics, Luce Vela Fortuno, Mia Love, Minorities, MSNBC, Republican National Convention, Ted Cruz)

There’s no question that MSNBC omitted every single speech delivered by a minority speaker at the Republican National Convention Tuesday night.

Mia Love.  Artur Davis.  Ted Cruz.  Brian Sandoval.  Luce’ Vela Fortuño.

All noticeably glossed over.

None of these fine speakers were highlighted by the network recently famous for watching miserable hack Chris Matthews practically foam at the mouth in an effort to label the Republicans racist, and for Toure claiming that Romney is involved in the “niggerization” of President Obama.

When popular Tea Party candidate Ted Cruz, the GOP nominee for Senate, took the stage, MSNBC cut away from the Republican National Convention and the Hispanic Republican from Texas’ speech.

MSNBC stayed on commercial through former Democratic Rep. Artur Davis’ speech, as well. Davis, who recently became a Republican, is black.

Then, when Puerto Rican Governor Luis Fortuno’s wife Luce’ Vela Fortuño took the stage minutes later, MSNBC hosts Rachel Maddow and Chris Matthews opted to talk over the First Lady’s speech.

And Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval? Noticeably missing from MSNBC, too.

Mia Love, a black candidate for Congress in Utah, was also ignored by MSNBC.

The only question is, did the network really intentionally cut away from minority speeches in an attempt to further paint the Republican party as a group of racist, white, old men?  It’s certainly plausible, is it not?

By the way, here is Utah congressional candidate Mia Love, absolutely lighting it up and living up to her conservative rock star image last night at the RNC.

Advertisements

Permalink Leave a Comment

Huffington Post Jumps the Shark on Global Warming Stupidity: It’s Real and It’s Racist

July 22, 2012 at 1:28 pm (Blacks, Comedy, Earth, Global Warming, Hispanics, Huffington post, Planet, Racism, Racist, Tea Party)

Normally, I wouldn’t point to anything this ignorant because it doesn’t warrant a response.  But I was strangely drawn to this piece in the same way that one is drawn to a car wreck on the highway.


Here we have a Huffington Post column claiming that not only is global warming real, but that it is apparently racist.

Who knew global warming was a Tea Partier?

H/t Weasel Zippers:

This summer 34,500 people were forced to evacuate their homes in my home state of Colorado. I watched as a dozen wildfires raged through the state with some contained in days or weeks, while others are still not extinguished.

The extremely hot weather, dry climate and dramatically reduced water supply that all led to the wildfires are part of a pattern that has been unfolding for more than a decade. In fact, the past 10 years have been unequivocally the hottest on record in the history of weather record keeping. But even that heat is dwarfed by what we’ve seen this year. According to the the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) the first six months of 2012 have been the hottest January-through-June period on record for the contiguous United States.

The national temperatures averaged “4.5 degrees above the long-term average,” the NOAA said in a statement last week.

None of this is a coincidence. It is the result of a manmade pandemic that could very well destroy the planet. It’s called climate change and it is very real and it is happening right now.

Make no mistake, this is a black issue.

The National Council of Churches Eco-Justice program has found that African Americans are at a higher risk for the short- and long-term effects of global warming. Cities will be hit harder by climate change because of what’s known as the “heat island” effect. Urban areas are covered in surfaces like asphalt and concrete that retain heat and as a result temperatures in these areas are higher, especially during heat waves.

Heat waves have stronger effects on urban populations and especially the urban poor. African Americans are more than twice as likely as whites to live in the inner city and nearly twice as likely as whites to live in poverty.

I’d like to point out to the author that the claim this is ‘a black issue’ is backed up by statements that ‘urban populations and especially the urban poor’ would be more readily susceptible to the effects of global warming.

Yet, in the paragraph before that he claims that global warming could “very well destroy the planet”.

He doubles up on that assertion later in the article saying:

This is how it starts.

It ends with seas and oceans rising to engulf entire cities, states and eventually countries.

If the planet is destroyed there Chicken Little, that would mean everyone has perished.

Which in turn would mean that global warming is very obviously NOT racially biased.  After all, if the planet has been wiped out it would mean the end of blacks, whites, Hispanics, Asians, cats, dogs, goldfish, unicorns, the three little pigs, etc.

The whole premise that global warming harms blacks disproportionately is out the window.

Much like the Huffington Post’s credibility in publishing this piece…

Permalink Leave a Comment