Authorities Warn of ‘Lone Wolf’ Threat on Anniversary of Bin Laden Death

April 26, 2012 at 11:00 am (Al Qaeda, Al Shabaab, Anniversary, FBI, Little Girl, Nidal Hasan, Osama Bin laden, Pakistan, Taliban, TSA)

And by lone wolf, we mean somebody fully integrated into the radical Islamic religion, may carry a business card stating that he/she is a ‘Soldier of Allah‘, and has continual correspondence with high-ranking overseas members of the Taliban.  Like that other famous ‘lone wolf’ Major Nidal Malik Hasan.  The important thing to remember here is that it will have nothing to do with radical Muslims. Nothing.

Via the New York Post:

Just days before the one-year anniversary of Osama bin Laden’s death, US authorities are warning that while there is no specific, credible threat to the US homeland they remain concerned “lone wolf” terrorists could use the date to avenge the former al Qaeda leader.
In an intelligence bulletin issued late Wednesday, the FBI, Department of Homeland Security and US Northern Command note that terrorist groups such as al Shabaab in Somalia, northern Africa’s al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and the Pakistani Taliban have called for revenge against the United States for killing bin Laden during the May 1, 2011 raid on his hideout in Pakistan.
The bulletin says al Qaeda or its affiliates would view an attack “on this anniversary as a symbolic victory,” especially in the wake of losses suffered by al Qaeda through US drone attacks and other efforts overseas.
In addition, according to the bulletin, authorities remain concerned that so-called “lone wolf” extremists not already identified “will execute attacks with little or no warning on or about the anniversary of bin Laden’s death.”

Meanwhile, the TSA is doing everything in their power to hunt down these lone wolf suspects, issuing bulletins for citizens to be on the lookout for these extremists:


Permalink Leave a Comment

Why is the U.S. Charging Robert Bales With the Murder of an Unborn Child, But Didn’t Charge Nidal Hasan?

March 26, 2012 at 1:50 pm (16 Villagers, Afghan Police, Afghanistan, Fort Hood, Francheska Velez, Life, Military, Nidal Hasan, Robert Bales, Unborn Child)

This is a legtimate question…  Robert Bales has been charged by the United States military with 17 counts of murder, one being for an unborn child.  Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood gunman, was not.

Via the New York Times:

One of the 17 murder counts that the United States military filed against Staff Sgt. Robert Bales is for the death of the unborn baby of one of his victims, a senior Afghan police official said on Monday.

Sergeant Bales was formally charged Friday with 17 counts of murder and 6 counts of assault and attempted murder. Afghan officials have said, however, that 16 villagers were killed in the March 11 massacre in a rural area of Kandahar Province.

An additional murder count for an unborn baby would explain the discrepancy between American and Afghan officials over the number of dead.

“The Americans are right and one of the females was pregnant, which is why they are saying 17,” said the Afghan police official, Brig. Gen. Abdul Raziq, the police chief in Kandahar Province.

By contrast, Nidal Malik Hasan was only charged by the military with 13 counts of murder after his shooting rampage.

Michelle Malkin reported:

At Hasan’s Article 32 trial yesterday, a witness testified about Velez’s searing last words before succumbing to gunshot wounds during the attack:

A pregnant soldier shot during a rampage at a Texas Army post last year cried out, “My baby! My baby!” as others crawled under desks, dodged bullets that pierced walls and rushed to help their bleeding comrades, a military court heard Monday.

A soldier had just told Spc. Jonathan Sims that she was expecting a baby and was preparing to go home, when the first volley of gunfire rang out Nov. 5 in a Fort Hood building where soldiers get medical tests before and after deploying.

“The female soldier that was sitting next to me was in the fetal position. She was screaming: ‘My baby! My baby!’” Sims said.

Pvt. Francheska Velez, a 21-year-old from Chicago, had become pregnant while serving in Iraq. She was among the 13 killed in the worst mass shooting on an American military base.

Should have been 14. Not 13.

A 14th charge of murder could have been levied against Hasan based on the Unborn Victims of Violence Act and Article 919a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.  This is the same code cited in the New York Times article on Robert Bales.

Charging Sergeant Bales with the death of a fetus would explain the discrepancy and under a seldom-used section of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the death of an unborn baby could be considered murder whether or not the killer was aware that a victim was pregnant and whether or not he had intended to kill the fetus.

Section 919a of the code, which also mirrors a similar United States federal law, states, “Any person subject to this chapter who engages in conduct that violates any of the provisions of law listed in subsection (b) and thereby causes the death of, or bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title 18) to a child who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place, is guilty of a separate offense under this section.”

Why was the seldom used section of the code invoked for Sergeant Bales, and not Major Hasan?

Permalink Leave a Comment