The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) took place in Washington, DC this weekend – a blockbuster event that brings together thousands of grassroots conservatives and conservative leaders for three days of major Presidential candidate speeches, policy discussions and networking opportunities.
On Thursday we ran into some scheduling difficulties that prevented our arrival on the first day, but had anticipated arriving for the after party known as BlogBash.
On Wednesday night I received this message in an e-mail concerning the BlogBash party on Thursday night:
Dress to impress. We know you spend a majority of your blogging-life eschewing pants, so look at this as an opportunity to show everyone what you’ve got… or cover what you haven’t got with a nice suit…
Well, wear what you want, but hint hint.
On Thursday night, somewhere on the Delaware Memorial Bridge, you may have seen a man on the side of the highway, on his knees like Tim Robbins in Shawshank Redemption, yelling “NO!!!!!!”
That was me.
I forgot to pack pants.
We missed a majority of the party because we had to go pants shopping.
Friday was a much better day. We armed ourselves with our media credentials and set about exploring every opportunity that we came across.
Most of the time was spent in awe – in awe of the public figures that were in attendance, in awe of the sheer amount of information and events that were taking place, but more so in awe of the bloggers in which I shared a lounge area called Blogger’s Row. I quietly observed as such renowned bloggers as Warner Todd Huston
, Seton Motley
, Jeff Dunetz
, Lachlan Markay
, Javier Manjarres
, Brian Garst
, and on and on. It was a who’s-who of political bloggers, and it had me thinking of my own contributions. From a ‘who’s-who’ to just plain ‘Who?’
CPAC also featured the cream of the crop in political activism – people like Tabitha Hale, Anita Moncrief (she is absolutely as sweet a person as everyone says), Bill O’Connell, Ali Akbar, etc.
And there was also a group of people that I wish I had the chance to meet, or had more time to interact with – Maggie Thurber
, Jeff Quinton
, Pamela Geller, Matt Sheffield, and so many more.
What is for sure is that there is still a level of divide between so-called mainstream journalists, and the bloggers that work so hard to bring you the real news. It is not a tangible divide but rather, a perceived divide, an animosity between the ‘real’ journalists and bloggers, a disdain.
This was evident at one point when several reporters came into the room to interview Allen West, essentially taking over the bloggers time to speak with him and to ask their own questions. This was personified at one point when a woman who was watching the entrance to the Blogger’s Lounge told several reporters and cameramen from C-Span that they had to leave. One journalist sneered at her and said, ‘Do you not want us to cover your event?’ Covering the event is one thing, but trying to sneak past to gain access to interviewees is wrong. Show some respect.
Without further rambling, here were some highlights from CPAC 2012..
West delivered what I consider to be the best speech from a politician at the event. This man is a great American, and he will be President one day in my humble opinion.
Highlights from his speech include these statements:
“If Americans take time to think about what they truly believe, they will find out they are conservatives.”
“It is the liberal philosophy, not the conservative one, that views humans as selfish automatons.”
“Liberals worry that what’s best for the individual might not be better for the public at large. But that philosophy assumes something vicious about each and every one of us. It assumes we only care about ourselves.”
And this one that got West a well-deserved standing ovation…
“Of course we have compassion. We just don’t believe the safety net should be used as a hammock.”
When Breitbart came out and the first thing out of his mouth was “Where are you, you Occupy freaks, with your glitter bombs?” we all knew we were in for a good speech. See, Breitbart says what a lot of people think in regards to liberals, the mainstream media, and the Occupy movement, but don’t have the courage to say it.
But beyond the fiery delivery, beyond the ‘I don’t care’ attitude that Breitbart exudes, he made an incredibly important point about the upcoming election.
I don’t care who our candidate is and I haven’t since the beginning of this. I haven’t! Ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate! …
When I walk through CPAC or a I travel the United States to meet people in the Tea Party who care – black, white, gay, and straight – anyone that’s willing to stand next to me to fight the progressive left, I will be in that bunker.
And if you’re not in that bunker because you’re not satisfied with [a certain] candidate, more than shame on you! You’re on the other side!
Period, end of story. I grow weary of constantly hearing conservatives say they will never vote for Candidate X because of Issue Y. Look at who is in the White House right now. If you’re not voting for Candidate X, then you might as well hand over your vote to President O.
Santorum pushed his case as the lone true conservative on the GOP side, launching subtle attacks at the the presumed inevitable candidate, Mitt Romney.
“We won in 2010 because conservatives rallied. They were excited about the candidates who were put forth. Why would an undecided voter vote for a candidate of the party who the party’s not excited about?”
He did not apologize for his conservatism…
“We will no longer abandon and apologize for the policies and principles that made this country great for a hollow victory in November.”
He attacked Obamacare…
“The major reason I’m in this race is because I think Obamacare is a game changer for America.”
And he blasted the administrations attempts at forcing Catholic hospitals and churches to pay for things that go against their morals and beliefs, a stance that brought about a massive standing ovation…
“This is the kind of coercion we can expect. It’s not about contraception. It’s about economic liberty, it’s about freedom of speech, it’s about freedom of religion. It’s about government control of your lives and it’s gotta stop.”
Newt’s speech was the most specific of all the Presidential candidates. He outlined a long list of items he would tend to on the very first day of his Presidency. While most were content with speaking in catch phrases or bumper sticker slogans, Newt offered a plan.
Gingrich talked for at least five minutes about which of President Barack Obama’s policies he would undo if elected to the White House, and summed it up this way: “We will have repudiated at least 40 percent of his government on the opening day.”
Further, in a clear shot at a Republican party all too ready to compromise or flat-out rollover to the administration’s strong arm tactics, Newt said…
“We need to teach the Republican establishment a lesson… We are determined to rebuild America, not manage its decay.”
Obama started that decay, will it be reversed in 2012?
Before a jam-packed crowd, with hundreds more watching on monitors in the convention center hallways and overflow rooms, Palin attacked the Obama economic agenda from many angles. She delivered the CPAC keynote speech, bringing down the house with a awe-inspiring gems…
“We aren’t red Americans, we aren’t blue Americans, we are red white and blue Americans and, President Obama, we are through with you!”
“We will never apologize for America’s strength and our greatness… we refuse to accept that a weak America means a better and safer world.”
“The president says small-town Americans, we bitterly cling to our religion and our guns because we’re just doggone frustrated with his pace of change. We say, ‘Keep your change. We’ll keep our God, our guns, our Constitution.’ ”
“Hope and change? Yea, you gotta hope things change.”
“This is Obama’s Washington. It is not the Washington of our founders, but the Washington of the permanent political class. It is something that our forefathers never envisioned as they would have sworn their lives, their fortunes, their sacred honor to change.”
“He says he has a jobs plan out, a jobs plan to ‘Win the Future.’ W.T.F. — I know.”
Tucker took part in an amusing segment called the ‘fight club’ debate against Paul Begala. I had the chance to meet Tucker for the first time, having contributed to the Daily Caller in the past and communicating via e-mail for some time now. He could not have been a more gracious person, agreeing to two pictures and actually making me feel like an important part of the program.
Need I say anything other than, Save Us Chuck Woolery!
CPAC was far and away the most exciting political event in my lifetime, and it was a humbling experience to take part in.
Leave a Comment
Well, she’s certainly making a case for the title.
In a piece titled, When white people lack “bourgeois values”,
the Salon Editor at Large
manages a race and class-baiting exacta, covering an alleged economic disdain shown by Republicans towards African-Americans, and charging the GOP with promoting policies which “shackle women to the home”.
In attacking a Rick Santorum speech on family values, in which he correctly stated, “When the family breaks down, the economy breaks down”, Walsh had this to say:
It’s a fascinating worldview that colors the entire GOP primary campaign, in which actual policies to help workers and families are rejected in favor of those that cut government and shackle women to the home, and it needs to be better understood.
It’s also another reminder that the prejudice and disdain Republicans once reserved for African-Americans has spread like a toxic mist to stigmatize a lot of other people, including a lot of white folks.
In citing proof of these allegations of prejudice towards white people, Walsh embarrassingly references the 46 million Americans on food stamps, the vast majority of whom are “white people”.
Embarrassing why? Because it was just last May that Walsh used the ‘food stamp’
argument to prove that Newt Gingrich had used the phrase as “coded racism” against “black people”.
Calling the use of the term ‘food stamp’, racist towards blacks, when a majority of those on food stamps are white, can only make sense in the mind of a bigot projecting their own true brand of racism.
Projection is a staple of the left. It is why they continue to harbor some of the more egregious offenders on the topic, whilst playing the race card at every turn. Rush Limbaugh
summed it up best when he said the following:
“Democrats and liberals think that we, conservatives, are racists, sexists, and all those other things. In fact, it is they who are those things. It is liberals who look at a human and first notice a skin color, or gender; then they get into sexual orientation, then segment into all kinds of groups. This is the way they see people. They also use projection quite commonly and regularly, and so it is us, they think, who are racists and sexists.”
Projection. In this facet, Joan Walsh excels. It was a few short months ago that Walsh went off on Glenn Beck for comparing the Obama administration to The Planet of the Apes. A simple analogy to a movie for some, but Walsh, in her infinite wisdom
, spotted something that nobody with cognitive reasoning skills could see – the prejudiced message behind Beck’s comparison.
But it runs much, much deeper. Scanning headlines concocted by the Salon editor reveals a consistent pattern of including race in nearly every argument. It is so prevalent, one wonders if race is the only prism in which Walsh views the world.
This January alone, Walsh wrote five articles which contained derogatory comments directed toward the GOP about race. Here is a sampling from each:
“While African-Americans are still more likely than whites to see that conflict (between rich and poor), the percentage of whites who agree tripled… credit the GOP for creating the conditions that allowed income inequality to soar”
“…prejudice and disdain Republicans once reserved for African-Americans has spread like a toxic mist to stigmatize a lot of other people, including a lot of white folks.”
“…having a black president makes it seem safe, and necessary, to unwrap Reagan’s pretty paper and once again make plain the GOP’s political association between welfare and African-Americans.”
“… Santorum’s comment about black people is straight from the GOP playbook that created the “Reagan Democrats”… That playbook helped convince the white working class that the government is taking their money and giving it to undeserving black people.”
“Santorum is doing what Republicans have done since the 60s: Trying to turn white people against government programs, and the government itself, by implying they only help black people.”
And when she’s not race-baiting her readers, Walsh breaks out the class warfare rhetoric. Of the ten total articles in January, eight center on either race or wealth inequality.
Walsh’s trend of racial rhetoric is not simply recent. In July of 2010, she flat-out accused the right in general and the Tea Party specifically
, of being racist. She wrote, “I honestly believe that the wanton use of that terrible term to defend Obama is part of why today, when there is genuine racism against the president from the right and within the Tea Party,
it’s sometimes hard to get anyone to pay attention.”
In that particular piece, Walsh ironically accused conservatives of distorting facts, and was immediately called out by a liberal colleague for actually distorting facts.
One of those Walsh had accused of distorting facts at that time was Daily Caller editor-in-chief, Tucker Carlson. In an e-mail conversation regarding her claims that Republican economic policies “keep women shackled to the home”, Carlson opined, “The economy can’t be too bad if Joan Walsh still has a job.”
As long as there is a liberal stranglehold on the media, there will always be a job out there for professionally intolerant and narrow-minded race-baiters like Joan Walsh.
Leave a Comment