Obama Administration Ordering Release of Illegal Immigrants As Long As They SAY They Qualify For DREAM Act

July 27, 2012 at 7:00 am (Amnesty, Border, Border Patrol, Border Security, Chris Crane, Department of Homeland Security, DREAM Act, Homeland Security, ICE, Illegal Aliens, Illegal Immigrant, Immigration, President Obama, Texas, White House)

A recent report from the Daily Caller highlights immigration officials claims that they are being forced to release illegal immigrants if they simply say they ‘went to high school’ or ‘have a GED’, requirements that would qualify them for the President’s new amnesty by executive order plan.

This is the equivalent of a police officer walking up to a bank robber and asking the person if they robbed the bank. If the thief says no, the police must release him.

It is a blatant compromise of national security, and I would love for somebody to explain how it does not also qualify as an impeachable offense.

The fact that President Obama granted amnesty to nearly 1 million illegal immigrants via an executive order was a stunning abuse of power in and of itself.  The fact that a suspected illegal immigrant can now go free just by claiming they qualify for the President’s plan virtually extends that amnesty to many more law-breakers.  And what are the odds that those who have no respect for the law of the land in the first place would simply lie in order to be released?

An excerpt from the Daily Caller report:

A top union official for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers said Thursday that President Barack Obama’s administration has ordered ICE agents to blindly — and without any evidence — believe illegal immigrants if they claim they qualify for Obama’s administrative DREAM Act.

Chris Crane, president of the National Immigration and Customs Enforcement Council, explained at a press conference on Capitol Hill Thursday afternoon how the new selective immigration law enforcement policy Obama announced during a White House Rose Garden speech in June is affecting the officers he represents.

“As we still wait on detailed guidance from the administration, it’s impossible to understand the full scope of the administration’s changes, but what we’ve seen so far concerns us greatly,” Crane, said. “As one example, prosecutorial discretion for DREAMers is solely based on the individual’s claims. Our orders are: If an alien says they went to high school, then let them go. If they say they have a GED, then let them go.”

“Officers have been told that there is no burden for the alien to prove anything,” he continued. “Even with the greatly relaxed policies, the alien is not required to prove that they meet any of the new criteria.”

 

Under the new orders, however, illegals can escape federal charges simply by claiming — whether it’s the truth or not — that they meet the DREAM Act rule’s requirements issued by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ICE agents have claimed the new guidelines amount to a free pass for illegal aliens.  It condones law-breaking for those who are already law-breakers.


Also mentioned at the press conference was a specific example of the new rules at work. 

One example used focused on last week’s El Paso, Texas incident where an illegal alien was arrested after he physically assaulted a family member, tried to keep that person from calling police and was subsequently arrested by an ICE agent who was then assaulted by the illegal alien himself before trying to flee arresting officers. Under the new DREAM Act, this man was released without charge because he was under 30 and said he went to high school in the U.S.

McCubbin and Crane further illustrate that agents do not need any proof that illegal aliens went to high school or received a GED- their word is good enough under President Obama’s new DREAMer policy.

The man physically assaulted a family member and an agent, and was released based on the fact that he said he went to high school?

Doug Ross summarizes, “Folks, we are seeing the civil society unravel right before our eyes.”

He added, “If we don’t stop this madness in November, we may well have lost the Republic.”

Unbelievable.  It may already be lost…

Advertisements

Permalink Leave a Comment

Homeland Security Instructing Border Patrol Agents to "Run Away" and "Hide"

July 2, 2012 at 7:52 am (Arizona, Border, Border Security, Department of Homeland Security, Fast and Furious, Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano)

Fausta’s blog is simply referring to it as “border security for pu**ies”.

Fox News has reported that border patrol agents in Arizona are not happy about a new ‘Active Shooter’ course being provided by the Department of Homeland Security, in which agents are instructed to ‘run away and hide’ when they encounter an ‘active shooter’.

One agent referred to it as ‘insulting’.

It’s one thing to tell civilian employees to cower under a desk if a gunman starts spraying fire in a confined area, say members of Tucson Local 2544/National Border Patrol Council, but to give armed law enforcement professionals the same advice is downright insulting. The instructions from DHS come in the form of pamphlets and a mandatory computer tutorial.

“We are now taught in an ‘Active Shooter’ course that if we encounter a shooter in a public place we are to ‘run away’ and ‘hide’” union leader Brandon Judd wrote on the website of 3,300-member union local. “If we are cornered by such a shooter we are to (only as a last resort) become ‘aggressive’ and ‘throw things’ at him or her. We are then advised to ‘call law enforcement’ and wait for their arrival (presumably, while more innocent victims are slaughtered).”

Here is a copy of the pocket guide to border security:

While it is difficult to read, the instructions throughout the pamphlet read like a sad comedy routine.  For example, step three in the ‘How to Respond’ section states that “when your life is in imminent danger” respond by “throwing items at the active shooter”.


How about, blow their head clean off of their body?


Fausta likens it to a Monty Python skit:

Say again? “Attempt to disrupt and/or incapacitate the active shooter”? Whatever happened to shoot to kill?

What’s next? Holler at them, “Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elder berries”?

It’s quite odd that our government has been arming drug cartels at the border with powerful assault weapons,  while simultaneously telling Americans working along the border to throw rocks back at them.

Permalink Leave a Comment